by Mitera Nikkou » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:11 pm
From what I've gathered, they pulled out the contaminated product back in the early eighties, from America and Europe, but then continued to sell it to other countries when they had a new product that was safer, which was sold in America (and possibly Europe). From what I understand of this, the company had a better market for their product in America and Europe, so it was in their best interest to do their best in those countries as far as quality and assurance was concerned. At the time, the other countries weren't really buying nearly as much; their product wasn't all that much demanded. But they still had a bunch of this older product lying around, that they had pulled from America and Europe, and it would have been a waste of money to get rid of it instead of sell it.
So, as far as I can tell, it's said that the FDA wouldn't allow Bayer to sell the tainted product domestically, so they went ahead and sold it to other countries while they sold their new, safer product in America. That's pretty incriminating right there. See, if the older product had been safe, they would have had no problem continuing to sell it while the new product was picking up steam. For one, that would have meant that more of the product would have been available, and it's said that not much of the new product was made all that quickly because there wasn't much of a supply of plasma at the time, which was needed to make the medicine. Plus, the new product was more expensive, so the old would have been easier to sell. Normally, when something is starting to be replaced, they try and sell as many of the older version of something before there's no market for it anymore, but that's not what happened here. There are certain methods used in a capitalistic market and, when the method deviates from what is normal, then there must be a reason for it other than what's normal for common practice.
I mean, it's common knowledge that, no matter if it's a one-person venture or a multinational business, people can go to great lengths to try and save what they had earned in the face of a problem that could result in a significant loss and/or getting involved with the law. You can even see it in legal businesses, such as insurance companies, that are not willing to accommodate you so easily even if your claim irrefutably meets the terms for compensation.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned because only women can give two tits for every tat.
♥