Page 1 of 1
Proof Rush Limbaugh is...
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:24 pm
by Kuroneko
A) A closeted gay man who does not want or need women
B) So stupid that he just screwed his chance of... well... getting screwed, any time soon by being your standard male misynogyst.
I'm banking on the first given the drug abuse and his third world country trip. Smart money's on Rush being a pedophile.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200612010005
Tell me for yourself, either he's stupid, or he's saying in pretty blunt terms that he's not interested in women at all.
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:35 pm
by Mistress Guendolen
You know, I'd say that this means more that he's one of those men who operates under the belief that women are secondary beings whose place is in the home, being guarded and watched over by men; he talked about how some women would love to be hired as eye candy. Well, that's how I think he percieves all women. To him, we're supposed to look pretty and let men do what they want and tell us what to do. The "knowing she can't take can't take care of herself" part of the analogy is very telling. If he's using a cat as an analogy for a woman, then it means he thinks women are not capable of self-maintenance to any long-term degree. I didn't have a high opinion of him to start with, and now it's just plummeted even further.... I've been maintaining myself quite capably since August, thank you very much.
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:05 pm
by May-chan
The sad thing is when I played DAoC and was on the message boards all the time, I knew some people there who clung to every word of his like it was divine wisdom... and they were also cat-fanatics... o_O But yeah, like Guen said: I always have thought of the guy as bottom-feeding scum anyways.
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:26 pm
by Coruscate
Since I just can't let my theory rest without arguing it at least once XD....
...you do, of course, know the tendency of closeted gay men to attack homosexuality to take attention away from themself.
Or uncoscious gay men attack homosexuality to soothe the conscious mind who is trying to deny it...
...so what does it mean when we have a supposedly heterosexual dude, who is a celebrity and is mega rich... who doesn't have any kind of girlfriend or visible relationship of any kind, doesn't have any kids, etc. etc. etc. and makes no real attempt to?
Look, I'm heterosexual by choice and I'm dying for lack of sex right now.... four years... I'm pretty confident it's been longer for what's his face. Well at least heterosexual sex.
And he did get caught smuggling around viagra under a pseudonym.
To a thirld world country known for child prostitution.
Now if you're rich... you go to the nice countries with the nice hotels and nice beaches and good security, food and safety.
If you're rich and famous shuttling off to a third world country makes no sense UNLESS... there's some other reason for you to be there.
With viagra pills.
And no hetero relationships.
After decades of being famous.
And being rich.
In America.
And in Florida, dripping in available women looking to get caught.
Right.
This dude's gay or trans or something... and I think his rants are because he doesn't understand and probably is afraid of women on some level or another... or perhaps even jealous?
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:56 pm
by May-chan
Lizard Queen wrote:Since I just can't let my theory rest without arguing it at least once XD....
...you do, of course, know the tendency of closeted gay men to attack homosexuality to take attention away from themself.
Or uncoscious gay men attack homosexuality to soothe the conscious mind who is trying to deny it...
Yeah, I was going to add that... like that homophobic evangelical leader guy who resigned because years of drugs and male prostitutes were catching up to him
And considering 80% of humanity are bisexual to a degree it's not hard to believe that all of the anti-gay people are probably just that way not only because of upbringing but also because of guilt
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:54 pm
by Coruscate
Was the 80% comment factual or just guesswork?
Just curious.
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:01 pm
by May-chan
No, it is a biological fact. I remember reading about it in psychology, it doesn't mean that 80% of people are actually fully bisexual or actually will ever be consciously attracted to both sexes, it just means there are either subconscious feelings of being attracted to both sexes or desiring male/female traits in a female/male partner or other stuff like that. And that only 10% are purely heterosexual and 10% purely homosexual.
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:13 pm
by Chibi MitchellTF
I think the reason he's not had any steady relationships is he's a sexist pig...
Posted:
Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:34 pm
by Flannery
*Smacks forhead.* Oh Rush you did it again, you dug yourself a hole. Well I listen to Rush Limbaugh every now and then, many of the things he says I agree with, this isn't one of them. He gets way to ahead of himself in one of his little rants by getting all bent out of shape and screwed up by saying something he will later regreat. Time and time again he does this, because he was never the brightest light bulb in the house.