by Mitera Nikkou » Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:28 pm
I went with biological. At least in my case. I've never been interested in sex, so I haven't even fantasized a "normal" coupling in regard to myself. (And, by "normal", it's with the intent to reproduce.) At times I wonder about it (getting married, having kids, and being a parent type stuff), but that just doesn't seem realistic for me. At the moment I can only attribute my interest in lesbianism to a certain biological matter that I consider to be a mistake: that being my sex, of course. Lesbianism didn't come to my attention (much less anything else of a sexual nature) until I realized that I wanted to be female. And nature dictates that females normally copulate with males, so I had to ask myself if I could do that if I were to become female... and that came out as a negative. Intellectually, I can recognize male aesthetics, much as I can a female's, but I don't have that certain... primal force for either of them. I simply find female aesthetics more appealing, so I guess I'm just more drawn to female stuff, to an extent. In the end I can't think of any conscious reason for why, and I certainly can't think of what impact any of my social and cultural experiences could have attributed to it, so a biological source is the best answer that I have. For me, anyway. But I'm willing to gamble that biology plays the biggest role for most in general.
And I know that no one read through that, so... I can get away with calling everyone a jalopy! Woo-hoo!
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned because only women can give two tits for every tat.
♥