Stellar wrote:That means that "of course!" is right up your alley. Cause saying "Yes, I'd like to be right all of the time about everything," many people would view the same as saying "I am right about everything all of the time."
I am not many people.
If I was, then I wouldn't be right all the time :p
People who don't analyze words like you or I would easily take either responce as having the same meaning because they don't particularly care what you know or think.
Or because they have a sub-standard grasp of English, maybe?
And unfortunately there are people here at MSF who don't hesitate to find the wrong meaning in text (even if it's a spelled out difference such as 'like to be' and 'am'). You could have gotten away with saying "I chose the 'I already know everything' option cause in all honesty I do," and it would have slipped by some readers thinking that was actually an option.
So, back to originally saying "There's no 'I already know everything' option," there is, when you look at the poll from a less strict state of mind.
... So you're argument amounts to "If you're not very bright/attentive, then you could easily make a mistake and assume that the first option is what you're looking for"?
... Okay, fine. I'll buy that.
But if you don't see what I mean, or dissagree, that's okay =) how bout lunch?
Mmmm, lunch...