Anyone else interested in asexuality?

[Mitera Nikkou]

I don't really understand what you mean, because of how you asked it.

Other than not needing to find a partner for conception, or another forcing conception, not much else would change. Well, except for a few things:

1: If asexual humans were to become a minority (and, in particular, if they were ostracized), I'm sure differences in culture would begin to develop. There're bound to be differences, much of which most people do already; I just don't know if there would be any particular direction that would be found as more favorable as far as development goes.

2: One plus one will equal two instead of three. ;p (Asexual reproduction makes sense mathematically! XD)

3: No menstruation and no menopause, both of which can greatly influence someone's day-to-day life (usually having to accommodate for rather than receiving benefits from).

4: The baby, in the womb, shouldn't be treated as a foreign object to the mother's body. I don't know if that would make any real difference, but I like the idea.

[Lucky]

I don't really understand what you mean, because of how you asked it.

Other than not needing to find a partner for conception, or another forcing conception, not much else would change. Well, except for a few things:

1: If asexual humans were to become a minority (and, in particular, if they were ostracized), I'm sure differences in culture would begin to develop. There're bound to be differences, much of which most people do already; I just don't know if there would be any particular direction that would be found as more favorable as far as development goes.

2: One plus one will equal two instead of three. ;p (Asexual reproduction makes sense mathematically! XD)

3: No menstruation and no menopause, both of which can greatly influence someone's day-to-day life (usually having to accommodate for rather than receiving benefits from).

4: The baby, in the womb, shouldn't be treated as a foreign object to the mother's body. I don't know if that would make any real difference, but I like the idea.

I was thinking more along the lines of earth worms, plants and ect; for if a humans were to become asexual whouldn't it be more like them? No Girls, No Boys just one gender witch can be mom or dad. The one gender can reproduce with or with out a mate, doesn't matter. So they have a choes of makes a exact genetic copy of them selfs or new worms with a partner.


If humans were to become asexual whouldn't it be more like that then budding and things like that?



The rest about that your saying I understod, I guess we were thinking of differnt kinds of asexual reprodution thow.

[Mitera Nikkou]

That sounds more like replication and hermaphroditism.

Basically, yes, one "gender"; but otherwise not sexually reproductive. Which means: no mates. If there is more than one term for a parent (such as mother and father), it'll be up to them. Otherwise, there won't be copies. And they can still adapt and evolve, just like many other non-sexual things can. Essentially, though, they will be female: because they can bear young.

[P-tan]

That would make life more boring..God or whatever made this merry-go-round made gender so guys could perve around girls and girls would show off to the guys.

Normally this type of material or anime would drive me crazy in these forums but now I'm enlightened and see that there is more to actual life than petty physical needs.

(I'm really sorry guys, Now I just can't stop talking about how "enlightened" I am. I guess personal habits don't rub off well.)

[Mitera Nikkou]

I never said anything about replacing sexual people with asexual people. If anything, having asexual people would just add more variation, not make things more boring.