Womanizer
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:59 am
I'm here to say that how we perceive a womanizer is wrong. It's some conspiracy, and/or a smear campaign against the transgendered/zap-filled people out there. Just think about it for a moment. The key to the problem lies in the suffix. A womanizer, by its current definition, is someone who mistreats women (at the very least for simply being self-centered and inconsiderate). However, in reality, the suffix "-ize" should dictate that the word (womanize) should mean: to treat someone like a woman. The problem with that, however, is the fact that ideas differ all around the world (and between each individual) on how to treat a woman. So, as you can see, the current definition has no bearing on logic, and the one that does leaves no clear definition.
In the end, the only meaning for womanizer that makes sense (with the suffix "-ize"), is where someone (or something) can make non-women into women. So, let's spread the word! Next time you transform someone into a woman, proudly proclaim that you are a womanizer, and that they just got womanized! Well, you don't have to, but put in a good word at some point! :O
Let's make this word the positive word is was supposed to be. Are you with me?
In the end, the only meaning for womanizer that makes sense (with the suffix "-ize"), is where someone (or something) can make non-women into women. So, let's spread the word! Next time you transform someone into a woman, proudly proclaim that you are a womanizer, and that they just got womanized! Well, you don't have to, but put in a good word at some point! :O
Let's make this word the positive word is was supposed to be. Are you with me?