Garath brought to my attention something I have to counter...
Xiao wrote:And them bragging about not having viruses? That's not a programming feat, it just means that the majority of people who hack/make viruses prefer to use a PC.
That's not entirely true. In fact, the Mac's base is a variant of BSD, which (like Linux) is frequently used as a server OS. Because they both have historical ties to UNIX (BSD and Linux), they are naturally more secure than the Windows line, simply because of historical reasons.
UNIX (and it's descendants and inspirational offshoots) was designed from day one to be a network OS, and as a result has security built right into the design. Windows is still tied majorly to the DOS concept of one user, which is why Windows computers are often run as Administrator (and in fact, frequently HAVE to be run that way to work). It is much, much harder to get a virus on a UNIX-based system, because it requires making it through the kernel's built-in checks, getting to one of the bin directories (most of which are owned by root and cannot be written to by anyone else), giving itself execution rights, and even then it can't run as root unless it has the root password (or some idiot set it up to allow passwordless root, which is utterly stupid).
The point? The historical differences in the systems have led to differing security models (well, if you want to call what Windows has a security model...).
UberLurker wrote:Glad to see another Fedora supporter.
I'm actually a member of the Fedora KDE group, and help out with making packages for the main repository (though I don't have many at this point, mainly because I was just approved last week).