Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Lives, Links, News, and TG. All these discussions abound in here!

Moderator: Moderators

Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Postby Mitera Nikkou » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:15 pm

Below will be a list of amendments that I hope will grow in size. I have started the list with two, and I hope to expand that by many times, with your help and imagination. The kind of transformation is not limited to gender transformation but to all transformations, to the extent that they are not too adult/perverse in nature. And the nature of the wordplay can't be effective to the extent that the transformation is nigh avoidable in any and all practical senses. (Example: Every man naturally has "family jewels", and women (stereo)typically wear and pass down more jewelry to their offspring, thus meaning that every person with family jewels must be female.) Basically, the more specific, rather than general, the better.

And now... Let us begin. Suggest your transformational wordplay! Or suggest changes to existing ones! :O

Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Amendment I

A womanizer is someone who can transform another into a woman by treating them like one. It is only effective if their treatment matches the target's idea of how a woman should be treated, and their physical and/or mental transformation reflects those views, to whatever degree the treatment rapports with said views.

Amendment II

Section 1: Using, applying, or measuring with an amount equivalent to a dollop will doll up a person in an attire fit for a doll, or something fancy and/or formal, regardless of their current attire (or lack of it). Exactly what kind of attire someone will find themselves with will depend on their understanding of what it means to be "dolled up."

Section 2: Consuming something that is perceived to be a dollop in size will transform the consumer into a doll. The kind of doll that they transform into, and whether they are alive or not, is dependent upon what it is they ate: by its constitution, texture, flavor and temperature.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned because only women can give two tits for every tat.
User avatar
Mitera Nikkou
Exalted MSFer
Exalted MSFer
 
Posts: 14029
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:55 am
Location: You are my escapism~<3

Re: Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Postby Alissa of Someday » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:22 pm

*Blinks.*

Wait...Did you post this before? It seems oddly familiar...
User avatar
Alissa of Someday
Active MSFer
Active MSFer
 
Posts: 975
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Uncertain.

Re: Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Postby Helel » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:30 pm

Afro-800 made a poll about the word womanizer a while ago. :O
User avatar
Helel
Hisho
Hisho
 
Posts: 4180
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:37 pm
Location: Watching You. O_O

Re: Constitution of Transformational Wordplay

Postby Mitera Nikkou » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:33 pm

Yup. I figured I could make it an amendment. ;p

Now contribute, you scalawags!
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned because only women can give two tits for every tat.
User avatar
Mitera Nikkou
Exalted MSFer
Exalted MSFer
 
Posts: 14029
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:55 am
Location: You are my escapism~<3


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests

cron