by Mitera Nikkou » Thu May 13, 2010 4:40 pm
I don't see it as a necessary evil, but as a flaw in human logic. All it does is breed conflict, impasse and compromise, and the inherent problems therein, rather than actually have their branch of government function like it's supposed to. And I can say that because our government had no intention of having a party system when it was formed, if I recall correctly. It didn't take long for a party system to form, but I can tell you that it wasn't for the interests of the people, because it was started by someone who wanted the kind of control that would be required to convince other people what they wanted, rather than themselves being convinced what he needed to do. And then the two-party system was cemented soon after because of a conflict of interests. And now the whole thing is backwards, where people have to conform to a party with set principles instead of expressing their individual ideas and their elected representatives conforming to, and reflecting, the majority of those ideas. All this does is give the parties the power, not the people, and gives the wrong kind of people the right reason to get involved in politics because, with power, there is money. And lo, most of our legislative branch is controlled by money, from interests that have nothing to do with the people's wants and needs. Rather than being the people's puppet, it's their puppet, to whom people must now rely on because most of their livelihood and securities depend on them.
A party system is nothing more than a simple-minded idea that serves no one other than those that wish to make a government look like a democracy or a republic, when, in reality, it's no more than an illusion to keep the masses ignorant of being slaves to other powers rather than being the power itself, as they're supposed to be. (Which is why people have to align themselves with a party, to be their soldiers, rather than elected officials taking orders from their respective districts and states.) Which works because most of the population are simple-minded and are led to believe that the system is "the way", or is "the best"; as if there's no room for improvement, when, in reality, it's been getting worse since the beginning.
I honestly see no benefit in having a party system. I think it's quite apt to say that a house divided upon itself can not stand, and I think that reflects exactly how most people feel about the legislative branch, and its inability to function adequately enough. At least, considering how god-awful low people consistently rate congress' performance, to the point that we can say that it's the opposite of progress, something is obviously very wrong with it.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned because only women can give two tits for every tat.
♥